What biases do you find in yourself about process addictions?
I find that because the physical dependency piece is not a part of process addictions, I may be less understanding and potentially less patient when it comes to the treatment process because I think I expect since the physiological blocks are less
Are there some behaviors your more readily accept or reject as being problematic or addicting? What shapes your views of these processes?
I honestly believe that any behavior can be problematic once it becomes impairing to a person’s life. When I think about the work addiction and how depending upon a person’s background working long hours or even multiple jobs is an accepted part of life and maybe even a societal expectation. It isn’t the action or behavior of working a lot that is problematic, it is the toll that it takes upon an individual, their family and their ability to function.
Are you more likely to call something an addiction if you are uncomfortable with the behavior or view it as undesirable or unhealthy?
I am more likely to call something an addiction if it has become disruptive to a person’s life and functioning. A key aspect in my view on the nature of addiction is the impairment. Everything from relationships to one’s livelihood is jeopardized by the behavior. Just because I am uncomfortable with the behavior or it is unhealthy in my view does not mean that an individual is addicted.
How might your own beliefs, morality, or spiritual beliefs shape your views of your client’s problems?
I may find it difficult to not minimize someone’s problems especially if I feel like the need to change is so much greater than the satisfaction they receive from their addiction. For example, if I am working with a client who is a compulsive buyer I may focus more on the process of self-regulation instead of processing their thoughts and feelings. I may want to jump right into changing the behavior instead of taking the time to build rapport because of my view of the importance of getting active to make change.